Jaguar XJR 2003 vs Lexus LS 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XJR
2003 - 2007
Lexus LS
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual Automatic
Engines: 4.24.3

Performance

Power: 395 HP282 - 290 HP
Torque: 540 NM417 - 434 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.3 seconds6.1 - 6.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.18.6 - 11.4
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.02 m
Width: 1.80 m1.83 m
Height: 1.31 m1.47 m
Jaguar XJR and Lexus LS are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres570 litres
Lexus LS has more luggage space.
Jaguar XJR has 140 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`263~ 2`335
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6200
Pros and Cons:
    Lexus LS has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv