Jaguar XJR 2003 vs Kia Opirus 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJR is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Opirus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.2 | 3.5 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 395 HP | 203 - 266 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 298 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.5 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 10.9 - 11.4 | |
|
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Opirus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.49 m | |
| Jaguar XJR is 5 cm longer than the Kia Opirus, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJR is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 450 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJR has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Opirus. This could mean that the Jaguar XJR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`263 | ~ 2`262 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Opirus has
| |