Jaguar XJR 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 4.2 (petrol) | 2.7 - 4.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XJ is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 395 HP | 204 - 400 HP | |
Torque: | 540 NM | 300 - 553 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 5.3 - 8.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 8.1 - 12.3 | |
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.45 m | |
Jaguar XJR is smaller. Jaguar XJR is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJR is 14 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
Jaguar XJ has more luggage space. Jaguar XJR has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`263 | ~ 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJR has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |