Jaguar XJR 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XJR
2003 - 2007
Jaguar XJ
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual Automatic
Engines: 4.2 (petrol)2.7 - 4.2 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XJ is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 395 HP204 - 400 HP
Torque: 540 NM300 - 553 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.3 seconds5.3 - 8.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.18.1 - 12.3
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.09 m
Width: 1.80 m1.86 m
Height: 1.31 m1.45 m
Jaguar XJR is smaller.
Jaguar XJR is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJR is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres470 litres
Jaguar XJ has more luggage space.
Jaguar XJR has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XJ.
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`263~ 1`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data9800
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJR has
  • only petrol engines available
Jaguar XJ has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv