Jaguar XJR 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJR is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Alfa Romeo 166 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJR is available with rear wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 166 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 395 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 181 - 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 7.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJR petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
| Jaguar XJR is 30 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJR is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJR has 60 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. This could mean that the Jaguar XJR uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`263 | ~ 1`931 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJR has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |