Jaguar XJ6 1986 vs Audi 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jaguar XJ6) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi 100) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ6 engine produces 45 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 35 NM less than Audi 100. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.7 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 1990 2.5 engine: Reliable and robust engine, keep an eye on the cooling system and the timing belt change interval. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ6 is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ6 is 20 cm longer than the Audi 100, 20 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ6 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |
