Jaguar XJ6 1986 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ6 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 235 HP | 92 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 380 NM | 171 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 10.8 seconds | 8.8 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.1 - 11.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ6 is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ6 is 25 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 25 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ6 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`748 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ6 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |