Jaguar XJ 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1992
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 226 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 60 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 23 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 12.0 | |
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.99 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |