Jaguar XJ 1989 vs Audi 100 1993
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 226 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 54 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 11.3 | |
Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Audi 100 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.99 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Audi 100, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1 metres more than that of the Audi 100, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Audi 100 has
| |