Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Opel Omega 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 377 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 568 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 174 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 266 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.3 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 22 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 865 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Omega has
| |