Jaguar XJ 1986 vs BMW 5 series 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 53 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 112 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |