Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Ford Sierra 1987
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 302 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 102 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 149 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 52 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.4 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`500 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |