Jaguar XJ 1990 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 26 HP more power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Audi 100. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.7 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XJ consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Audi 100, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1 metres more than that of the Audi 100, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Audi 100 has
| |