Jaguar XJ 1990 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 4 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 31 NM more than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XJ consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |