Jaguar XJ 1990 vs Opel Omega 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ and Opel Omega have the same engine power, but Jaguar XJ torque is 33 NM more than Opel Omega. Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XJ consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 25 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Opel Omega has
| |