Jaguar XJ 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 298 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 54 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.3 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 25 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |