Jaguar XJ 1990 vs BMW 5 series 1988
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 188 HP | |
Torque: | 298 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Jaguar XJ engine produces 12 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 38 NM more than BMW 5 series. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 12.7 l/100km | |
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XJ consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XJ consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
710 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.99 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |