Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 24 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.2 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Audi 100, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1 metres more than that of the Audi 100, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi 100 has
| |