Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Jaguar XJ) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo 940) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 41 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo 940. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |