Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 54 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 12 cm longer than the Volvo 960, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |