Jaguar XJ 1986 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, but torque is 3 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 25 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |