Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 326 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 512 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ 1994 is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ 1994 engine produces 26 HP more power than Jaguar XJ 2003, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Jaguar XJ 2003. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 10.9 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ 1994 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ 1994 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 1994 is smaller. Jaguar XJ 1994 is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ 2003, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ 1994 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 1994 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means Jaguar XJ 1994 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |