Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 392 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ 1994 engine produces 51 HP less power than Jaguar XJ 2003, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Jaguar XJ 2003. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.9 | |
| Jaguar XJ 1994 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ 1994 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 1994 is smaller. Jaguar XJ 1994 is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ 2003, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ 1994 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 1994 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means Jaguar XJ 1994 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |