Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Subaru Impreza 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 8 HP more power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Subaru Impreza. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.2 | |
|
The Subaru Impreza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 68 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.3 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |