Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 72 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.5 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.7 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |