Jaguar XJ 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 35 HP more power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 75 NM less than BMW 5 series. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 24 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJ is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.1 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |