Jaguar XJ 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 219 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 69 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 125 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.9 | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.41 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 30 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.1 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`955 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |