Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Volvo 940. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 15 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |