Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Jaguar XJ 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ 1994 engine produces 21 HP less power than Jaguar XJ 2003, but torque is 15 NM more than Jaguar XJ 2003. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.5 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ 1994 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ 1994 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 1994 is smaller. Jaguar XJ 1994 is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ 2003, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ 1994 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 1994 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XJ 2003, which means Jaguar XJ 1994 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |