Jaguar XJ 1994 vs BMW 3 series 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 69 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 125 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.0 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 59 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |