Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Chrysler Concorde 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 219 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Jaguar XJ engine produces 56 HP more power than Chrysler Concorde, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Chrysler Concorde. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.3 | |
Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Concorde) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.15 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.43 m | |
Jaguar XJ is smaller. Jaguar XJ is 13 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 473 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
| |