Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Lexus LS 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 553 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 110 HP more power than Lexus LS, whereas torque is 119 NM more than Lexus LS. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.6 | |
|
The Lexus LS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 7 cm longer than the Lexus LS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 570 litres | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.8 metres more than that of the Lexus LS, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Lexus LS has
| |