Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ 2003 engine produces 51 HP more power than Jaguar XJ 1994, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Jaguar XJ 1994. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.6 | |
| Jaguar XJ 2003 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ 1994, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ 2003 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is larger. Jaguar XJ 2003 is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ 1994, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ 2003 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 2003 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ 1994, which means Jaguar XJ 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |