Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Subaru Impreza 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 262 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 37 HP more power than Subaru Impreza, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Subaru Impreza. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.2 | |
|
The Subaru Impreza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 67 cm longer than the Subaru Impreza, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.7 metres more than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |