Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Audi A8 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 262 HP | 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A8 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 73 HP less power than Audi A8, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Audi A8. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 11.9 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A8, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 4 cm longer than the Audi A8, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A8, which means Jaguar XJ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Audi A8 has
| |