Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Lexus LS 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 262 HP | 281 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 417 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 19 HP less power than Lexus LS, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Lexus LS. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 12.1 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 9 cm longer than the Lexus LS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 552 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.3 metres more than that of the Lexus LS, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Lexus LS has
| |