Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 196 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 44 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.0 | |
| Jaguar XJ consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S80) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 27 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |