Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ 2003 engine produces 21 HP more power than Jaguar XJ 1994, but torque is 15 NM less than Jaguar XJ 1994. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ 2003 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ 1994, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is larger. Jaguar XJ 2003 is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ 1994, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ 2003 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 2003 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ 1994, which means Jaguar XJ 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |