Jaguar XJ 2005 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 321 NM | 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Chrysler 300C is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Chrysler 300C. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 7 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 504 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJ has 34 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`360 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |