Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 470 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 474 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 164 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.0 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.82 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 47 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |