Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Volvo S80 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S80, but torque is 200 NM more than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 11.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | Used also on Volvo XC60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XJ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 40 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |