Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Audi A6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 3 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Audi A6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 31 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJ has 10 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.8 metres more than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Audi A6 has
| |