Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Volkswagen Phaeton 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen Phaeton, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volkswagen Phaeton. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.5 | |
|
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Phaeton, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen Phaeton, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 500 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 20 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Phaeton. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Phaeton, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volkswagen Phaeton has
| |