Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012

 
Jaguar XJ
2009 - 2015
Volkswagen Passat CC
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.6 Petrol
Diesel (Jaguar XJ) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen Passat CC) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 275 HP300 HP
Torque: 600 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds5.5 seconds
Jaguar XJ engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 250 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.29.3
The Jaguar XJ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Jaguar XJ consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Jaguar XJ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 82 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1410 km on highway940 km on highway
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.25 m4.80 m
Width: 1.89 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Jaguar XJ is larger.
Jaguar XJ is 45 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres532 litres
Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJ has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3652`130
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14 00015 200
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJ has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat CC has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv