Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Jaguar XF 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ engine produces 85 HP more power than Jaguar XF. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.4 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 29 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 540 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XJ has 20 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the Jaguar XJ uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.3 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |