Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Jaguar XF 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Jaguar XJ and Jaguar XF have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.8 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.25 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 29 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 500 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 20 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.22 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |