Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Honda Accord 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Jaguar XJ engine produces 97 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 165 NM more than Honda Accord. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 48 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Accord) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.26 m | 4.88 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 37 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 473 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 22 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
| |