Jaguar XJ 2015 vs BMW 7 series 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Jaguar XJ) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (BMW 7 series) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 7 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 18 HP less power than BMW 7 series, whereas torque is 60 NM less than BMW 7 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 46 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 16 cm longer than the BMW 7 series, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 40 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 7 sērija has
| |