Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Volvo S90 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 HP | 310 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XJ engine produces 70 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.6 | |
The Volvo S90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.26 m | 4.96 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 29 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`360 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 22 800 | 21 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |