Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Lexus ES 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XJ engine produces 40 HP more power than Lexus ES, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Lexus ES. Thanks to more power Jaguar XJ reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.6 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XJ consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XJ could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XJ) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 28 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 472 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`110 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 31 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Lexus ES has
| |