Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 - 326 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 512 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 9.4 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.0 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.39 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 20 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.7 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`743 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |